Reviews of

Canon Formation

In Bloomsbury, Canon, Catholic Epistles, Darian R. Lockett, Letter collections, Levi Baker, W. Edward Glenny on May 6, 2024 at 3:49 pm

2024.05.04 | W. Edward Glenny and Darian R. Lockett, eds. Canon Formation: Tracing the Role of Sub-Collections in the Biblical Canon. London: T & T Clark, 2023.

Review by Levi Baker, William Tennent School of Theology.

Over the past two decades there has been increasing interest in the sub-collections that comprise the Jewish and Christian biblical canons. Yet these technical studies often feel like insider conversations and remain largely inaccessible to broader biblical scholarship. A single-volume work addressing the sub-collections across the Christian Bible has been sorely needed.

Luke the Chronicler

In 1 & 2 Chronicles, 1 & 2 Kings, 1 & 2 Samuel, Brill, Ched Spellman, David (king of Israel), Intertextuality, Luke-Acts, Mark S. Giacobbe on April 13, 2024 at 3:23 pm

2024.04.03 | Mark S. Giacobbe. Luke the Chronicler: The Narrative Arc of Samuel-Kings and Chronicles in Luke-Acts. Bible Interpretation Series 211. Brill, 2023. 289 pp. $144.00. 

Review by Ched Spellman, Cedarville University.

In the opening of the Gospel of Luke, the author includes a prologue that overviews his purpose in writing this “orderly narrative” and identifies elements of his method (Luke 1:1–4). Beyond these orienting authorial comments, is it possible to detect any specific textual template that Luke might have made use of as he structured his narration and interpretation of the story of Jesus and the early church?

The Things that Make for Peace

In Gospels, Jesse Nickel, Kendall A. Davis, Second Temple, Violence on March 13, 2024 at 8:29 pm

2024.03.02 | Jesse P. Nickel. The Things that Make for Peace: Jesus and Eschatological Violence. BZNW 244. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2021.

Review by Kendall A. Davis, University of Edinburgh.

In this revision of his PhD thesis, Jesse Nickel seeks to answer the following question: “how does understanding eschatology and violence together … enable us to make better sense of the presence and/or absence of violence in Jesus’ life and ministry?” (p. 3). In particular, Nickel seeks to refute what he calls the “seditious Jesus hypothesis” (SJH), the idea that the historical Jesus was really a violent revolutionary and that Jesus’ rejections of violence are later additions to the Jesus tradition. Scholars who hold to the SJH, according to Nickel, include S. G. F. Brandon, Dale Martin, and Fernando Bermejo-Rubio. Nickel argues that such perspectives fail in large part because they misunderstand Jewish eschatology. In particular, they assume that eschatology is “other-worldly” and therefore “irrelevant to ‘this-worldly’ matters” (p. 5). By contrast, Nickel argues that “certain elements of Jewish eschatology … inherently involved violence; and that such expectations played a motivational role in the revolutionary violence that was frequent during the Second Temple period” (p. 7). Nickel calls such violence “eschatological violence” and argues that Jesus’ “nonviolence” should be understood as a rejection of this pervasive concept of eschatological violence.